Safe driving monitoring system

ABSTRACT

A method and system for detecting unsafe or suspect activities such as distracted driving associates distracted driving events to the road type, vehicle speed and vehicle acceleration (positive, negative and lateral) at the time of the distracted driving event, and identifies severe distracted driving events from a large population of minor events using a statistical distribution such as a Cauchy distribution equation. The system employs a smartphone application (App) coupled with a central server that computes driver safety scores which relate time of day, road type, vehicle speed, vehicle acceleration (positive, negative and lateral) and distracted driving using the Cauchy distribution equation. The server renders summary and detail reports of driving scores and distracted driving events to concerned parties including insurance companies, fleet managers, vehicle owners and the parents/guardians of teenaged drivers.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

This patent application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/298,557, filed Oct. 20, 2016, which is a continuation-in-part (CIP) under 35 U.S.C. § 120 of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/848,230, filed Mar. 21, 2013, entitled “SAFE DRIVING MONITORING SYSTEM,” which is a CIP of Ser. No. 11/370,651, Filed Mar. 8, 2006, entitled “METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING AND STORING EXCESSIVE VEHICLE SPEED,” and claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent App. No. 61/613,690, filed Mar. 21, 2012, entitled 10 “MONITORING AND REPORTING OF DISTRACTED DRIVING EVENTS,” both incorporated herein by reference in entirety.

BACKGROUND

Modern proliferation of smaller personal electronic devices, as well as increasing bandwidth and connectivity, allows usage and enjoyment of such devices in an increasing number of locations. Combined with seemingly endless availability of consumer commodities such as food and beverage offerings available for take-out and drive-thru, contributes to a plethora of potential driving distractions, particularly for novice drivers. Media attention has also heightened as an increasing number of driving mishaps are traced to distracted driving, often resulting from usage of personal electronic devices.

Distracted driving includes any activity that could divert a person's attention away from the primary task of driving. All distractions endanger driver, passenger, and bystander safety. In particular, however, because text messaging, email usage and web browsing require visual, manual, and cognitive attention from the driver, they are by far the most alarming distractions. This problem exists for all types of driver: professional fleet drivers, non-commercial drivers who use a company vehicle for business, drivers of their own private vehicles, inexperienced drivers and teenaged drivers.

SUMMARY

A method and system for detecting unsafe or suspect activities such as distracted driving associates distracted driving events to the road type, vehicle speed and vehicle acceleration (positive, negative and lateral) at the time of the distracted driving event, and identifies severe distracted driving events from a large population of minor events using a statistical distribution such as a Cauchy distribution equation. The system employs a smartphone application (App) coupled with a central server that computes driver safety scores which relate time of day, road type, vehicle speed, vehicle acceleration (positive, negative and lateral) and distracted driving using the Cauchy distribution equation. The server renders summary and detail reports of driving scores and distracted driving events to concerned parties including insurance companies, fleet managers, vehicle owners and the parents/guardians of teenaged drivers.

Configurations herein are based, in part, on the observation that conventional approaches to driving assessment focus on individual events and preventing or tracking such specific events, such as preventing use of certain apps (i.e. texting) or exceeding a pre-set speed limit (i.e. 85 mph). Unfortunately, such conventional approaches fail to consider an overall performance of a monitored driver that considers positive and negative factors over an extended time period to assess a level of care. Accordingly, configurations herein substantially overcome the above described shortcomings by determining an aggregate score of a driving session by accumulating a number of factors related to distracted, inattentive, and/or risky driving behavior, and computing a conclusive summation of results, rather than an unrelated set of specific events. A driving score includes measurement of abrupt actions (starting, stopping), sudden movements (angular velocity indicative of hard cornering), vehicle speed over a range of different road types, and usage of particular applications (apps) on a personal device.

Personal electronic devices such cellphones, smartphones, tablets and the like are often carried as commonly as keys, wallet or purse. The driving monitoring system as disclosed herein takes the form of a downloadable app which launches and executes on the personal device and communicates with a central server for reporting driving activity, particularly suspect activities which may indicate a potentially risky or dangerous behavior. In particular, the app monitors the use of other apps which may be considered to distract the driver from attention to the road, and motion parameters such as speed and angular velocity which indicate physical driving patterns considered to be associated with inattentive, risky, or distracted behavior.

Events gathered by the app are communicated to a server for coalescing with other raw event data of other drivers, and computing reports of driving habits as well as a score which is normalized with scores of other drivers to provide an objective assessment of driving. A statistical distribution such as a Cauchy distribution measures a severity of an event, and may emphasize a significant deviation as a separate notification. For example, a 5-10 mph (miles per hour) speed limit transgression is not as serious as a 90 mph traveling speed. Reports and individual events are reported to a supervisory or ownership entity such as a parent or employer. Further, verification of app operation is verified so that a driver may not avoid scrutiny by disabling the app or powering down the personal device.

In an example configuration discussed below, the disclosed method for tracking driving habits includes associating a personal device with a driver in a vehicle, determining that the driver is engaging in a suspect activity while driving, comparing the suspect activity with a severity scale indicative of a relative risk of the activity, computing a score based on the comparison and reporting the determined suspect activity and the score to a repository for accumulating a driving history of the driver. The method may include more specific operations depending on the type of suspect event. For example, the method for tracking driving events may include determining, via a personal device associated with a driver in a vehicle, a speed of the vehicle based on relative positioning of the personal device, and receiving a user defined speed threshold corresponding to a road type determined from the position of the vehicle, in which the threshold is defined for the road type. The method compares the speed to the received threshold and reports the determined speed and the road type if the determined speed exceeds the threshold corresponding to the road type currently being traveled.

An environment for operation of the system and method disclosed herein includes a server for aggregating and reporting distracted driving events comprising, a repository for storing suspect events received from personal devices corresponding to a plurality of monitored drivers, an access connection from the server to a personal device of each of the plurality of monitored drivers, and scoring logic for receiving the suspect events from the personal devices and computing a score indicative of safe driving habits exhibited by the monitored drivers.

Alternate configurations of the invention include a multiprogramming or multiprocessing computerized device such as a multiprocessor, controller or dedicated computing device or the like configured with software and/or circuitry (e.g., a processor as summarized above) to process any or all of the method operations disclosed herein as embodiments of the invention. Still other embodiments of the invention include software programs such as a Java Virtual Machine and/or an operating system that can operate alone or in conjunction with each other with a multiprocessing computerized device to perform the method embodiment steps and operations summarized above and disclosed in detail below. One such embodiment comprises a computer program product that has a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium including computer program logic encoded as instructions thereon that, when performed in a multiprocessing computerized device having a coupling of a memory and a processor, programs the processor to perform the operations disclosed herein as embodiments of the invention to carry out data access requests. Such arrangements of the invention are typically provided as software, code and/or other data (e.g., data structures) arranged or encoded on a computer readable medium such as an optical medium (e.g., CD-ROM), floppy or hard disk or other medium such as firmware or microcode in one or more ROM, RAM or PROM chips, field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) or as an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC). The software or firmware or other such configurations can be installed onto the computerized device (e.g., during operating system execution or during environment installation) to cause the computerized device to perform the techniques explained herein as embodiments of the invention.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing and other features will be apparent from the following description of particular embodiments disclosed herein, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings in which like reference characters refer to the same parts throughout the different views. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention.

FIG. 1 is a context diagram of a computing environment suitable for use with configurations herein;

FIG. 2 is a flowchart of a particular configuration in the environment of FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a server in the environment of FIG. 1;

FIGS. 4A-4E are charts of driving parameter distribution using the distribution model of FIG. 3;

FIGS. 5A-5C are a flowchart of scoring computation in the server of FIG. 3; and

FIGS. 6A, 6B-1 and 6B-2 show Graphical User Interface (GUI) screens rendered by the server of FIGS. 1 and 3.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Configurations below depict a system and method for monitoring suspect events indicative of distracted driving. Distracted driving is any activity that could divert a person's attention away from the primary task of driving, particular interactive apps because text messaging, email usage and web browsing require visual, manual, and cognitive attention from the driver, they are by far the most alarming distractions. This problem exists for all types of driver: professional fleet drivers, non-commercial drivers who use a company vehicle for business, drivers of their own private vehicles, inexperienced drivers and teenaged drivers.

A method and system for detecting distracted driving associates distracted driving events to the road type, vehicle speed and vehicle acceleration (positive, negative and lateral) at the time of the distracted driving event, and identifies severe distracted driving events from a large population of minor events using the Cauchy distribution equation, computing driver safely scores which relate time of day, road type, vehicle speed, vehicle acceleration (positive, negative and lateral) and distracted driving using the Cauchy distribution equation, and providing summary and detail reports of driving scores and distracted driving events to concerned parties including insurance companies, fleet managers, vehicle owners and the parents/guardians of teenaged drivers.

Recent media attention focused on operator inattentiveness makes clear that driver distraction occurs not just by handling a phone for voice calling or texting. Any cognitive task done while operating a vehicle has been proven to add to driver distraction and impaired ability to operate a vehicle. These tasks include hands free calling by using a headset or speaker phone, hands free calling by pairing the personal device to the vehicle head unit and using the vehicle sound system and microphone for audio commands and listening, using voice to text and text to voice services on the personal device or though the vehicle head unit, audible notifications though either the personal device or vehicle head unit, displayed notifications through either the personal device or vehicle head unit, text message sending through either the personal or vehicle head unit, text message reading through either the personal device or vehicle head unit, navigation system use on either the personal device or vehicle head unit, internet browser usage either through the personal device or vehicle head unit, as well as any other interactions with the personal device or vehicle head unit such as lane departure warning, low tire pressure warning and engine performance data displayed on the vehicle head unit.

Several studies and authorities concur on the gravity of distracted driving. The US Department of Transportation (USDOT) has launched a nationwide campaign to stop distracted driving. Other statistics they sight are:

In 2009, 5,474 people were killed in crashes involving driver distraction, and an estimated 448,000 were injured. (NHTSA).

16% of fatal crashes in 2009 involved reports of distracted driving. (NHTSA)

20% of injury crashes in 2009 involved reports of distracted driving. (NHTSA).

According to at least one source, teen drivers are more likely than other age groups to be involved in a fatal crash where distraction is reported. In 2009, 16% of teen drivers involved in a fatal crash were reported to have been distracted. (NHTSA).

40% of all American teens say they have been in a car when the driver used a cell phone in a way that put people in danger. (Pew)

Drivers who use hand-held devices are 4 times more likely to get into crashes serious enough to injure themselves (Monash University)

Text messaging creates a crash risk 23 times worse than driving while not distracted. (VTTI).

FIG. 1 is a context diagram of a computing environment suitable for use with configurations herein. In FIG. 1, a monitored driving environment 100, a driving evaluator application (app) 120 executes on a personal electronic device 110 (personal device) such as a mobile phone or smartphone. The app 120 gathers data and events pertaining to driving performance, and is associated with a driver 112 of a vehicle 116. The driver 112 is distinguished from a passenger 114 of the vehicle through an electronic appliance that recognizes the driver's device 110 (mobile phone), such as a telematics box or other communication medium. A GPS interface 126 access GPS technology 140 for location identification.

A cellphone antenna 130 or tower receives signals 121 from the personal device 110 for communicating suspect event data to a server 150 via a public access network 132 such as the Internet. Messages 122 containing suspect event data are sent to a server 150. The server 150 stores the event data in a repository 152 for generating a report 124 of driving activity for display on a rendering device 126 such as a laptop, PC or another mobile device. The rendering device 126 allows review of driving performance by a monitoring user 140, such as a parent, supervisor or manager at a home 141 or office 142 location

FIG. 2 is a flowchart of a particular configuration in the environment of FIG. 1. Referring to FIGS. 1 and 2, the method for tracking driving habits as disclosed herein includes, at step 200, associating a personal device 110 with a driver 112 in a vehicle 116, and determining that the driver 112 is engaging in a suspect activity while driving, as depicted at step 201. Passenger presence is determined with a vehicle comparison, discussed further below, so that activities of the driver are not erroneously attributed to a passenger also having the app 120. The app 120 invokes the server 150 to compare the suspect activity with a severity scale indicative of a relative risk of the activity, as shown at step 202, and computes a score based on the comparison, as disclosed at step 203. The server 150 then reports the determined suspect activity and the score to the repository 152 for accumulating a driving history of the driver 112, as depicted at step 205.

FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a server in the environment of FIG. 1. Referring to FIGS. 1 and 3, the application (app) 120 on the personal device 110 identifies suspect activities and sends a message 122 to the server including the data concerning the suspect activity. The personal device 110 includes sensors and components for sensing the data indicative of the suspect activity, such as a GPS (Global Positioning System) interface 130, accelerometer 132, telematics interface 134 and ambient light sensor 136.

The GPS interface 130 employs GPS technology 140 for locating the personal device 110 using latitude and longitude components common to GPS measurements. The accelerometer 132 measures angular velocity for detecting sharp turns and sudden acceleration and braking. The telematics interface 134 provides a link to a telematics appliance 135 for identifying the vehicle, and can also be employed to offload the GPS burden, discussed further below. The ambient light sensor 138 can determine day or night driving conditions, or alternatively the time of day may be employed.

The server 150 includes a distribution model 154, scoring logic 156, and an event reporter 158. The distribution model 154 compares raw event data from a suspect event to previous events of the same driving parameter, such as speed, to determine a statistical ranking of the suspect event. The scoring logic computes a score for the suspect event, and aggregates the scores over time for computing an overall score of a time interval or driving period. The event reporter 158 stores and retrieves the event data, and renders reports 124 of computed scores as well as individual events 122′ deemed to warrant a reporting urgency, discussed further below.

FIGS. 4A-4E show charts of driving parameter distribution using the distribution model 154 of FIG. 3. The distribution model 154 is a statistical model such as a Cauchy distribution, although alternate configurations may employ standard deviation or other model. The model is employed for associating unsafe driving events using a scalar parameter such as excessive speed, harsh acceleration, harsh braking, harsh cornering and distracted driving for comparison with scalar values of other drivers and computing a score indicative of the severity, or deviation from norm, of the suspect event, and may include factors such as the road type, time of day, traffic congestion, weather and other ambient conditions. FIG. 4A shows a graph 400 depicting in general Cauchy scoring model for speed (mph) 410 contrasted with a linear model 412. A horizontal axis 404 indicates mph over a threshold (not necessarily a posted speed limit); thresholds are user/supervisor settable based on road type, with corresponding values 404′. A vertical axis 402 has values 402′ and indicates a scoring impact for the speed values. Referring to FIGS. 4B and 4C, a point value per road type is shown to illustrate the effect on scoring for suspect events on different road types. Each of road types 1, 2 and 3 are shown respectively in columns 421, 422 and 423. A road type refers to the general speed and character of the road, such as width, volume and frequency/sharpness of curves, and may be characterized as residential, rural, commercial, and highway, for example. The graph of FIG. 4C shows corresponding curves and axes 420′, 421′, 422′ and 423′ for respective columns (values) 420, 421, 422 and 423. A corresponding speed threshold value is also shown in table 425, which refers to the threshold parameter in the Cauchy equation, discussed further below. As can be construed from the chart, mad type 3 is likely the most restrictive in character, probably referring to a residential road where excessive speed is strongly deterred, since a mere 5 mph over threshold speed has a score impact from 100 to 37.5. Similarly, road type 1 may be a highway, as the speed overages impact the score only mildly in the first 5 mph over threshold.

FIGS. 4D and 4E illustrate changes to scoring criteria using the Cauchy model. In FIGS. 4D and 4E, columns 451, 452 and 453 refer respectively to road types 1, 2 and 3, for speed overages 450. In contrast to FIGS. 4B and 4C, however, type 3 roads are even less tolerant to a mere 5 mph overage, reducing the score from 100 to 27.8, due to the different threshold parameters in table 475. Road types 1 and 2 are also more restrictive to the 5 mph overage, at 86.7 and 81.8, respectively. Corresponding graphs 451′, 452′ and 453′ are shown for columns 451, 452 and 453, respectively, against threshold axis 450′, reflecting column 450.

The disclosed Cauchy Scoring employs road type, assigned speed and recorded speed. Other parameters could be used. In the current methods in use, billions of points and trips must be sorted to find events that indicate risky driving patterns. This method allows easy and rapid sorting of driving events in low and high risk of crash categories. Additionally, the worst 10% of all drivers can be rapidly identified.

The characteristics of the Cauchy Distribution make it especially useful in identifying marginal and extreme events from a large population of minor events. The Cauchy Distribution modifies a standard bell curve (long tail) to a curve with short tails so that marginal and extreme events can be easily identified.

As each sample is processed, the target parameter is compared to the acceptable threshold setting. Threshold settings can be in MPH or KPH. For example:

A speed of 50 mph is compared to threshold of 40 mph for that road type.

An acceleration event of +0.35 g is compared to a threshold of +0.275 g

A braking event of −0.40 g is compared to a threshold of −0.275 g

A cornering event of 0.30 g is compared to a threshold of 0.20 g

A distracted driving event at 30 mph is compared to a threshold of 0 mph.

In the most often used method, a sample is taken and processed once per second while the vehicle is in motion. This method has the beneficial effect of normalizing the driving score over time as each point of a trip is scored independently. The total trip score is the sum of the scores for each point in the trip.

Note that the Cauchy Scoring can be tuned to score distracted driving events very harshly by adjusting the road type threshold setting. As shown in the chart referenced below, the score for a sample point drops quickly as the speed above the threshold increases.

The scoring process follows a Cauchy survival function of the speed of a vehicle over a reference speed. The reference speed can be the road speed limit, the posted speed limit, the average road speed or any other speed threshold used for scoring purposes. The generalized scoring equation is as follows:

${{score}\left( {k,r} \right)} = {100*\left( {\frac{V}{2} - \frac{\arctan \left( {\left( {k - r - H} \right)/S} \right)}{\pi}} \right)}$

The variables of the equation are: k: (measured) speed of the vehicle r: reference speed In another embodiment, the input variables can be positive, negative and lateral accelerations measured in g forces, meters per second per second, or feet per second per second. The parameters can be defined as follows: V: vertical translation of the graph H: horizontal translation of the graph S: scale to define the graph slope

Scoring is affected not only by the speed of the vehicle but by some other variables like twilight, weather, age of the driver, type of car, geographic area, etc. So the parameters can be adjusted by conditions not related to speed. As a major effect on the score, besides the speed, the method employs different values of H depending of the time of the day using the nautical twilight. The nautical twilight is calculated using the time and the position of the vehicle to determine if the vehicle is being driven at day or night.

As practical examples, using miles per hour, we found the following good parameter values (i.e. day H=13, night H=8) for scoring:

${{Day}\mspace{14mu} {{Score}\left( {k,r} \right)}} = {100*\left( {\frac{1.02}{2} - \frac{\arctan \left( {\left( {k - r - 13} \right)/1} \right)}{\pi}} \right)}$ ${{Night}\mspace{14mu} {{Score}\left( {k,r} \right)}} = {100*\left( {\frac{1.02}{2} - \frac{\arctan \left( {\left( {k - r - 8} \right)/1} \right)}{\pi}} \right)}$

FIGS. 5A-5C are a flowchart of scoring computation in the server of FIG. 3. Referring to FIGS. 3 and 5A-5C, at step 300, the method for tracking driving habits includes associating a personal device with a driver in a vehicle. This may include associating the personal device with the vehicle by identifying a positioning device disposed in the vehicle of a monitored driver, in which the positioning device is a telematics unit (appliance) 135 responsive to the personal device 110, as depicted at step 301. Telematics devices are commonly deployed with vehicles for providing GPS support and communication with an interactive service for emergency or concierge types of response, depending on a desired service level. Application 120 invocation may be facilitated by near field communication (NFC) based on proximity to the vehicle, such that the application is invoked automatically each time the driver enters the vehicle, as depicted at step 302.

Bluetooth, Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) and WiFi have become the industry standards for connecting a driver's personal device to the driven vehicle to access and use these services. It will be recognized to those knowledgeable in the art that additional wireless standards will be available in future. These wireless topologies can be used instead of Near Field Communications (NFC) to logically pair a driven vehicle to a driver's personal device. Similar to Near Field Communications (NFC), these wireless topologies have the advantage of being short range and can reliably determine that the driver's personal device is operating within the driven vehicle at any given time. Further, vehicle manufacturers are increasing installing their own telematics systems, and phones are being paired to factory installed displays for phone calling, texting web access, email and voice control.

In the event a user is not a driver, the server 150 concludes passenger status at step 303 by receiving a location indication of the personal device 110, as depicted at step 304, and receiving a location indication of the positioning device 135, as shown at step 305. The server 150 identifies a mismatch of the location indications as indicative of passenger 114 status of a user corresponding to the personal device 110, as depicted at step 306. Since the vehicle positioning device 135 (telematics box) is not the one associated with the passenger's personal device, the server 150 concludes that the user is a passenger in another driver's car. Alternatively, in the case of a corporation having shift drivers in the same vehicle, a time window is associated with the personal device of each user/employee to indicate which driver is associated with the vehicle at a particular time.

The app 120 determines that the driver is engaging in a suspect activity while driving, as depicted at step 307, and takes one of several actions, depending on the suspect event. At step 308, if the suspect activity includes invoking applications on the personal device 110, the app 110 compares the invoked application to a set of distracting applications, as shown at step 308.

The suspect activity may also include at least one of speeding, sharp turning, sudden acceleration, sudden deceleration, and may be quantified using a metric such as one of speed, angular velocity, linear acceleration. A measured driving parameter could then include speed and angular force measurable on a linear scale to driving parameters of other drivers, as measured by an accelerometer and GPS sensors/messages on the personal device 110.

The personal device 110 compares the suspect activity with a severity scale indicative of a relative risk of the activity, typically via messaging or an exchange with the server 150, as depicted at step 309. This includes determining a metric associated with the suspect activity, such as speed or a sudden change in direction, as depicted at step 310. A driving parameter associated with the determined metric is computed such as miles per hour (mph), angular velocity, or starting/stopping times, as shown at step 311. The driving parameter is intended to be a scalar quantity that can be compared in a statistical manner (such as via a Cauchy distribution) to suspect activities of other drivers. The driving parameter is compared to a statistical distribution of events of other drivers for the same driving parameter, as depicted at step 312, and may be concluded as a high severity if the driving parameter is outside a predetermined range of the statistical distribution, as shown at step 313. Such a high severity may be immediately reported to an authority (monitoring user 140), while more benign suspect events are logged and reported in summary form at a later time.

In the example configuration shown, in the event that the suspect activity is speeding, at step 314, the driving parameter is vehicle speed and the statistical distribution is a Cauchy distribution, as depicted at step 314. In this case, determining the suspect activity includes receiving a user selection of a road type and a threshold speed for that road type, as shown at step 315. The road type, as discussed further below with respect to FIG. 5, generally denotes appropriate speed due to such factors as width, sharp curves, visibility and density (rural, residential, etc.), for example, and is received by the app 120 as an initialization or startup parameter. Other factors may be used. The app 120 determines that the vehicle is traveling on a particular road type, due to GPS determined location and a road classification database indicative of the road type, as shown at step 316. The app 120 may determine that the vehicle is exceeding the user (supervisor) defined threshold speed for the road type, which is independent from and may be greater or less than the posted legal speed limit for the road, as shown at step 317.

The road type may be determined by any suitable manner, such as the road classification database discussed above, or other manner such as the speed monitoring determination disclosed in the US patent application cited above. The road classification is distinguished from a posted speed limit because road classification is defined by a different authority and is not necessarily determinable from the speed limit. GPS engine providers typically have their own road classification layer which provides a homogenous road classification system world wide, so a class 2 road in the US would have the same speed profile as a class 2 road in other countries. Other sources of road type include the US Census Bureau Tiger Road Classification System.

In contrast, a posted speed limit is determined by local law enforcement, and often changes over the same road type. For example, speed limits often vary when approaching a major intersection, while the general road type would remain the same. The road type may be one of rural, suburban, highway, city, commercial, residential and private, to name several. Other labels may be applied. The road type denotes a structure and character to a road, which is a factor in a level of attentiveness and speed required for maintaining safe driving. A narrow, windy rural road requires more attention of the driver and lower speed to accommodate common and sharp turns which may come up suddenly. A commercial street may be wide and straight, allowing a higher speed but having more congestion and vehicles likely to stop suddenly for deliveries. A residential street commands a lower speed due to the risk of pedestrians. A highway has predictable curves and long visibility, and may be appropriate for higher speed and be more tolerant of a lessened driver attention. Published road classifications identifying such road types are obtainable.

For each of the suspect events discussed above, using the gathered information, a score is computed based on the comparison (statistical model of other suspect events), as depicted at step 318, and the determined suspect activity and the score reported to the repository 152 for accumulating a driving history of the driver, as disclosed at step 319.

From time to time during app execution, or at the bequest of the user/supervisor 140, a conformation request signal may be sent from the server to the app to confirm that the app is actively monitoring driving so that the driver cannot avoid scrutiny by disabling or exiting the app or phone. At step 320, if a signal was received, then the server 150 proceeds to confirm operation of the personal device at step 321 by receiving a location indication of the personal device, as depicted at step 322, and receives a location indication of the positioning device, as shown at step 323. The server 150 then compares the received location indications to conclude driver presence in the vehicle and operation of the app 120 for monitoring driving, as shown at step 324.

Generally, a series of suspect events are gathered during an operating session or interval, and an aggregate score computed. Accordingly, at step 325, a check is performed to identify if additional suspect events are being gathered, and accordingly the server 150 and app 120 collectively determine a plurality of the suspect activities and corresponding score and compute an aggregate score based on the plurality of reported suspect activities, and control reverts to step 307 to monitor and gather the next suspect event, as shown at step 326.

FIGS. 6A, 6B-1 and 6B-2 show Graphical User Interface (GUI) screens rendered by the server of FIGS. 1 and 3. Referring to FIGS. 1, 3, 6A, 6B-1 and 6B-2, a rendering screen 126′ on the rendering device 126 presents the report 124 of a monitored driver 112 for viewing by the monitoring user 140 (parent, employer, etc.). Individual suspect events 122′ are shown in an event window 184, and selection (highlighted event 185) displays an event location icon 186 in a map display window 182 to identify the location at which the suspect event 122′ occurred. Statistical graphs of different event types (speed over threshold, hard stop, application use, etc.) are shown in statistics window 180, and show an individual driver graph 174 next to a general distribution graph 172 based on the driving population at large (or for a specific suspect such as age, geography, etc.) as stored in the repository 152.

FIG. 6B shows a rendering of all events 122′ for a specific driver, sorted by category (driving, system, summary, etc.). An event label column 190 shows the specific event name, and whether it was posted on the portal (column 192) or sent directly to contacts (monitoring user 140) in column 194 for events having a significant severity or immediate need for redress. The description column 196 clarifies the nature of the event indicated in the label column 190.

In a particular configuration, the method for tracking driving activity includes associating a personal device with a driver in a vehicle by establishing a driver presence in the vehicle, and receiving driving parameters indicative of vehicle operation. The personal device executes an app coupled wirelessly or wired to the telematics box in the vehicle, and is coupled to a remote server. The personal device transmits the received driving parameters to the server for determining if the associated driver is engaging in a suspect activity while driving the vehicle by performing a Cauchy distribution for comparing the received driving parameters denoting the suspect activity with a severity scale indicative of a relative risk of the suspect activity, such that the relative risk is based on values derived from driving parameters of other drivers. The server therefore operates as a common repository for multiple drivers for accumulating a statistical base of driving patterns.

The server is also responsive to a monitoring entity, such as a parent or employer, for retrieval of the suspect activity and retrieval of the driving parameters used for determining the suspect activity, typically by an Internet GUT interface and authentication. The server is further operable for accumulating the gathered parameters for computing a score of the driver based on the comparison, concluding that a suspect activity is occurring based on the computed score, and reporting the determined suspect activity and the score to a repository for accumulating a driving history of the driver.

Driver presence is defined by establishing communication with a telematics appliance affixed to the vehicle and connected to the vehicle for gathering sensor information indicative of vehicle movement. Communications between the personal device and the telematics appliance includes at least one of Bluetooth, Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE), WiFi, near field communication (NFC) and transmissions under IEEE 802.11, or other suitable wired or wireless mechanism. Similarly, communications between the personal device and the server may include at least one of Bluetooth, WiFi, near field communication (NFC) and transmissions under IEEE 802.11. The telematics appliance is typically a factory installation and includes an interface to an OBDII (On-Board Diagnostics II) network interconnecting vehicle sensors for sensing the driving parameters, the telematics appliance responsive to an app on the personal device for receiving the driving parameters

The determined the suspect activity includes one or more of the driving parameters exceeding a threshold based on a Cauchy distribution of the driving parameters, and also includes identifying driver use of the personal device while in the vehicle, and reporting the suspect activity to the server. Such use of the personal device includes texting, email access, Internet browsing, voice communication, an app invocation, as well as other activities tending to compromise driver alertness.

The personal device is a typical cellphone or smartphone carried by the user, and may include any suitable phone, tablet, laptop, watch or other computing and telecommunications device specific to the user and adapted for wireless electronic communication and execution of apps defined by preprogrammed computing instructions.

Generally, the driving parameters include scalar quantities indicative of vehicle motion and ambient conditions in which the vehicle is disposed, and the suspect activity includes at least one of driving parameters exceeding the threshold or operator usage of the personal device. The Cauchy distribution includes a distribution based on a first driving parameter translated by a second driving parameter, however any suitable statistical analysis could be employed.

In operation, the disclosed approach creates a database on the driver's personal device that associates the subject driven vehicle's Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) to the driver's personal device and/or creates a database on a server that associates the subject driven vehicle's Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) to the driver's personal device. The driver's personal device will query itself for its Mobile Station International Subscriber Directory Number (MSISDN) (commonly called the phone number),

Integrated Circuit Card Identifier (ICCID) or International Mobile Equipment Identity number (IMEI).

An alternative disclosed approach creates a database on the driver's personal device that associates the subject driven vehicle's unique Bluetooth device serial number (commonly called the BD_ADDR or Media Access Control (MAC) address) to the driver's personal device and/or creates a database on a server that associates the subject driven vehicle's unique Bluetooth device serial number to the driver's personal device.

A third alternative disclosed approach creates a database on the driver's personal device that associates the subject driven vehicle's unique Wifi device serial number (commonly called Media Access Control (MAC) address) or unique Will device Service Set Identifier (SSID) to the driver's personal device and/or creates a database on a server that associates the subject driven vehicle's unique Will Media Access Control (MAC) address to the driver's personal device.

Identification of the user device may include Receiving the Mobile Station

International Subscriber Directory Number (MSISDN) (commonly called the phone number), Integrated Circuit Card Identifier (ICCID) or International Mobile Equipment Identity number (IMEI). The Mobile Station International Subscriber Directory Number (MSISDN) (commonly called the phone number), Integrated Circuit Card Identifier (ICCID) or International Mobile Equipment Identity number (IMEI) is stored in either the personal device database or server database. The driver's personal device will query the vehicle for its VIN, BD_ADDR, Media Access Control (MAC) address or Service Set Identifier (SSID) either through Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE), Bluetooth, WiFi. Mobile network or NFC.

This may include, upon driver invocation of the monitoring app on their device, Receiving the Vehicle Identification Number (VIN), BD_ADDR, Media Access Control (MAC) address or Service Set Identifier (SSID), and storing the Vehicle Identification Number (VIN), BD_ADDR (12 char hex Bluetooth address), Media Access Control (MAC) address or Service Set Identifier (SSID) in the personal device database or server database. This is used to ascertain if the user's personal device is being used within the subject driven vehicle. Any suitable identifier may be employed if the VIN is not available, and the pairing of the driver's device to the vehicle may include a variety of exchanges available to the personal device, such as (using MSISDN, ICCD or IMSI) the MSISDN uniquely identifying a subscription or subscriber in a GSM or a UMTS mobile network; the ICCID is an Integrated Circuit Card Identifier, and the IMSI is an International mobile subscriber identity. In operation, a scenario may be anticipated where multiple passengers, each with a personal device, is invoked. Distracted driving can be ascertained when a personal device is invoked from a paired vehicle associated with that device, since only the regular operator would be paired. Usage of other devices by passengers is not as much a concern for distracted driving (other than by the mere presence of passengers being a distraction, which may not be a trivial concern). Other scenarios may be envisioned, where a paired driver is a passenger in their own (paired) vehicle, or when driving someone else's car. In such a scenario, it would be beneficial to determine a seated position of the user of the paired device, to determine if they are, in fact, seated in the operator position. Finer usage of GPS, Near Field Communication, and directional antennas may facilitate such finer distinction. However, in most usage patterns, determination of device usage in the presence of the paired vehicle is employed as a determiner as an operator of the vehicle. In other words, if the user is seated in their paired vehicle, they are assumed to be driving.

Those skilled in the art should readily appreciate that the programs and methods defined herein are deliverable to a computer processing and rendering device in many forms, including but not limited to a) information permanently stored on non-writeable storage media such as ROM devices, b) information alterably stored on writeable non-transitory storage media such as floppy disks, magnetic tapes, CDs, RAM devices, and other magnetic and optical media, or c) information conveyed to a computer through communication media, as in an electronic network such as the Internet or telephone modem lines. The operations and methods may be implemented in a software executable object or as a set of encoded instructions for execution by a processor responsive to the instructions. Alternatively, the operations and methods disclosed herein may be embodied in whole or in part using hardware components, such as Application Specific integrated Circuits (ASICs), Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs), state machines, controllers or other hardware components or devices, or a combination of hardware, software, and firmware components.

While the system and methods defined herein have been particularly shown and described with references to embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the scope of the invention encompassed by the appended claims. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A method for tracking driving activity, comprising: associating a personal device with a driver in a vehicle by establishing a driver presence in an operator position in the vehicle; receiving driving parameters indicative of vehicle operation; and transmitting the received driving parameters to a server for determining if the associated driver is engaging in a suspect activity while driving the vehicle by performing a Cauchy distribution for comparing the received driving parameters denoting the suspect activity with a severity scale indicative of a relative risk of the suspect activity, the relative risk based on values derived from driving parameters of other drivers; the server further operable for: accumulating the gathered parameters for computing a score of the driver based on the comparison; concluding that a suspect activity is occurring based on the computed score; and reporting the determined suspect activity and the score to a repository for accumulating a driving history of the driver.
 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the driver presence is defined by establishing communication with a telematics appliance affixed to the vehicle and connected to the vehicle for gathering sensor information indicative of vehicle movement.
 3. The method of claim 2 wherein communications between the personal device and the telematics appliance includes at least one of Bluetooth, Bluetooth Low Energy, WiFi, near field communication (NFC) and transmissions under IEEE 802.11.
 4. The method of claim 1 wherein communications between the personal device and the server includes at least one of Bluetooth, Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE), WiFi, near field communication (NFC) and transmissions under IEEE 802.11.
 5. The method of claim 1 wherein the suspect activity includes one or more of the driving parameters exceeding a threshold based on a Cauchy distribution of the driving parameters.
 6. The method of claim 5 wherein concluding the suspect activity includes identifying driver use of the personal device while in the vehicle, and reporting the suspect activity to the server.
 7. The method of claim 6 wherein the use of the personal device includes texting, Internet browsing, voice communication, an app invocation.
 8. The method of claim 1 wherein the personal device is a computing and telecommunications device specific to the user and adapted for wireless electronic communication and execution of apps defined by preprogrammed computing instructions.
 9. The method of claim 2 wherein the telematics appliance includes an interface to an OBDII (On-Board Diagnostics II) network interconnecting vehicle sensors for sensing the driving parameters, the telematics appliance responsive to an app on the personal device for receiving the driving parameters.
 10. The method of claim 5 wherein the driving parameters include scalar quantities indicative of vehicle motion and ambient conditions in which the vehicle is disposed, and the suspect activity includes at least one of driving parameters exceeding the threshold or operator usage of the personal device.
 11. The method of claim 1 wherein the Cauchy distribution includes a distribution based on a first driving parameter translated by a second driving parameter.
 12. The method of claim 1 wherein the server is responsive to a monitoring entity for retrieval of the suspect activity and retrieval of the driving parameters used for determining the suspect activity.
 13. The method of claim 1 wherein the server is configured to aggregate suspect events gathered during a monitored interval, and for employing a Cauchy distribution for computing a severity of the event, the monitored interval defined by a time and a distance, the severity determining an impact on the computed score.
 14. The method of claim 3 wherein associating the driver includes pairing the driver with a VIN (Vehicle Identification Number) of the vehicle by storing the VIN with an identifier of the personal device, the identifier of the personal device defined by at least one of MSISDN, ICCID, IMSI, BD_ADDR or MAC address.
 15. A computer program product having computer program instructions stored on a non-transitory computer readable storage medium for performing a method for tracking driving habits, comprising: associating a personal device with a driver in a vehicle by establishing a driver presence in an operator position in the vehicle; gathering driving parameters indicative of vehicle operation; transmitting the gathered driving parameters to a remote server for determining that the driver is engaging in a suspect activity while driving by invoking a Cauchy distribution for comparing the gathered driving parameters denoting the suspect activity with a severity scale indicative of a relative risk of the activity, the relative risk computed based on values derived from driving parameters of other drivers; the server further operable for accumulating the gathered parameters for computing a score based on the comparison; concluding that a suspect activity is occurring based on the computed score; and reporting the determined suspect activity and the score to a repository for accumulating a driving history of the driver.
 16. The computer program product claim 15 further comprising determining a plurality of the suspect activities and corresponding score and computing an aggregate score based on the plurality of reported suspect activities.
 17. The computer program product of claim 16 wherein comparing further comprises: determining a metric associated with the suspect activity; computing a driving parameter associated with the determined metric; comparing the driving parameter to a statistical distribution of events of other drivers for the same driving parameter; and concluding a high severity if the driving parameter is outside a predetermined range of the statistical distribution.
 18. A system for tracking vehicle driving behavior by a monitoring entity, comprising: a personal device having an app for gathering driving parameters indicative of vehicle operation; a telematics appliance disposed in the vehicle and operable to pair with the personal device for establishing a driver presence in an operator position in the vehicle the telematics appliance affixed to the vehicle and connected to the vehicle for gathering sensor information indicative of vehicle movement; a remote server in communication with the personal device for receiving, processing and comparing the gathered driving parameters; a network interface in the device and responsive to the app for transmitting the received driving parameters to the server for determining if the associated driver is engaging in a suspect activity while driving the vehicle by performing a Cauchy distribution for comparing the received driving parameters denoting the suspect activity with a severity scale indicative of a relative risk of the suspect activity, the relative risk based on values derived from driving parameters of other drivers; the server further operable for: accumulating the gathered parameters for computing a score of the driver based on the comparison; concluding that a suspect activity is occurring based on the computed score; and reporting the determined suspect activity and the score to a repository for accumulating a driving history of the driver.
 19. The system of claim 1 wherein the suspect activity includes one or more of the driving parameters exceeding a threshold based on a Cauchy distribution of the driving parameters.
 20. The system of claim 19 wherein the driving parameters include scalar quantities indicative of vehicle motion and ambient conditions in which the vehicle is disposed, and the suspect activity includes at least one of driving parameters exceeding the threshold or operator usage of the persona device. 